Beyond the soft palate


13 11 14

For almost 15 fucking years now, I have been listening to one bunch of dopey bastards after another gibber and squawk about refugees or asylum seekers and boats and “illegals” and I’m fucking fed up to the fucking back teeth with it all.

There has been no discussion. There has been no debate. A conversation has not been had.

A “policy” has been Frankenstein’d into being at the behest of 60% of Australians who “want the Abbott government [and the three governments before it] to “increase the severity of the treatment of asylum seekers”, because that, and that alone gnaws at the very core of their being, day after day, month after month, minute by minute – in the home, the workplace, the pub, the coffee shop, every day is a Bad Day at Black Rock, there be strangers comin’ to town, and pokin’ their noses into things they ain’t got no business with …

… The Howard “battlers”, Hanson’s children, slumped into their Harvey Norman 3-Year, Interest-Free, Nothing-To-Pay Now* (*conditions apply), 4-seater beige bonded leather lounge with chaise, poking at a Playstation, a tabloid on the coffee table, 2GB on the radio, all they hear and read are the headlines, the screams and the screeches, and they say things like “Won’t recognize the fucking country in a couple years ‘cause of all these cunts they’re lettin’ in”, and “It’s not the Australia I grew up in, that’s for sure”, and “They let these cunts in and throw fucking money and welfare and fucking houses at ‘em, and what about us, eh? What about the fucking rest of us?” …

Tad Tietze – “Those reasons (for the continued asylum debate) are defined primarily by the political needs of elites to create scapegoats and distractions for their failure to provide security to ordinary people already living here – not of borders, but of a social kind. That is, they seek to displace social insecurity into a defence of national integrity, here in the form of ‘border security’, in the process shifting blame for social ills onto an external ‘other’ that is threatening to invade and disrupt our livelihoods and cohesion. While previously the natural territory of the Right, the mainstream Left has been drawn into playing this game the more it has abandoned its traditional support base in favour of pro-corporate neoliberal policies.”

The very character of our country is being assaulted by the devious and the deviant on a daily basis, our way of life, our traditions, our culture, our Holy days (Lest We Forget), it’s all going under, can’t you see?


Donald Horne – “Australia is a lucky country, run by second-rate people who share its luck.”

Fifty years after Horne first wrote those words, we’re right back there now, the second-rate are in charge again (with a vengeance), small-minded provincialism masquerades as “national pride”, mediocrity is applauded as modesty, philistinism is back in vogue, and expertise is dead

“There’s also that immutable problem known as “human nature.” It has a name now: it’s called the Dunning-Kruger effect, which says, in sum, that the dumber you are, the more confident you are that you’re not actually dumb. And when you get invested in being aggressively dumb…well, the last thing you want to encounter are experts who disagree with you, and so you dismiss them in order to maintain your unreasonably high opinion of yourself.

All of these are symptoms of the same disease: a manic reinterpretation of “democracy” in which everyone must have their say, and no one must be “disrespected.” … This yearning for respect and equality, even—perhaps especially—if unearned, is so intense that it brooks no disagreement …

…Thus, at least some of the people who reject expertise are not really, as they often claim, showing their independence of thought. They are instead rejecting anything that might stir a gnawing insecurity that their own opinion might not be worth all that much.”

At the same time Government holds a Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, we traffic refugee children from country to country, telling them neither why nor where they will be sent, but for certain it will not be pleasant, of that we will definitely make sure …

David Marr – “The miracle is that after nearly 40 years of this we’re still as confident as ever that once the latest brutal campaign is done, once the boats have stopped again, we can go back to being the decent people we thought we were. We don’t read it for what it is: a permanent regime of cruelty.

A long time ago we set the dial at brutal and we’ve kept it there. That’s hard to face. It goes against our deepest sense of ourselves. But stopping the boats is about us as well as them. The major parties, the Murdoch press and tabloid radio is urging the nation not to lose its resolve. But while a slew of inquires ask what happened on Manus it might be time for Australians to start asking: what have we become?”

True to ourselves.

This is who we are at heart. Who we really are.


We are not egalitarian. There is no such thing as the “fair-go”. We are not “relaxed and easy-going”.

We are petty, small, mean and vindictive, a nation of mailroom clerks wedded to “due process” and rules and regulations, orderly queues to tidy messy lives, “serves you right”, “you should have known better”, to the sounds of “What About Me” from Moving Pictures on an endless loop, multiculturalism a takeaway curry from the local Indian on a Friday night after a piss-up and a packet of Laksa mix in the pantry.

We are White Australia still.

Australia for the White Man.

The tens upon tens of millions upon millions of words that have been written, spoken, broadcast over this last decade and a half on this matter turn not the heads of the 60%.

A man is bashed and dies, a child drowns, a mother wails.

Bomb alles!

Fuck ‘em.

The 60% shout, “We are not for turning!”

The 60% don’t read David Marr. They read The Daily Telegraph, The Herald-Sun, they look at headlines, big headlines, headlines about “these people”, “these people” who are “BREAKING OUR RULES!”, coming here to take our jobs, wasting our taxes on handouts, and fucking tins for fucking biscuits and coathangers to hang their fucking clothes from, for Chrissakes.


“These people.”

“We’ll teach ‘em. We’ll teach the bastards. You don’t fuck with Aussie, mate. You don’t fuck with us, you fucking vermin, you fucking terrorists, you fucking cheats, you liars, you scum, you dogs, you mongrel fucks, go back to where you fucking came from, you cunts.”

So sayeth the 60%.

Our rage is impotent. Our protests mere irritants to the ears of the 60%, the hollow rattlings of blunt sabres in the far-off distance, hearts bleeding in silence, a confusion of noiseless whimpers in the dark, the whimpers of dogs whipped into submission, whipped into silence, whipped, whipped, whipped, for now and forevermore.

The 60% say …

“We won.”

Yes. Yes, they have.

The rest of us?

Wir sind jetzt die Flüchtlinge.


Once upon a time in a land, far, far away …

From The Whitlam Institute

“The change the Whitlam Government enacted in the area of healthcare was transformative. The introduction of a universal healthcare system – Medibank was one of the reforms that defined the Whitlam Government and its underlying philosophy. The guiding mission was to provide adequate healthcare to all citizens regardless of their financial means. In his 1972 election campaign speech, Whitlam stated: ‘I personally find quite unacceptable a system whereby the man who drives my Commonwealth car in Sydney pays twice as much for the same family cover as I have, not despite the fact that my income is 4 or 5 times higher than his, but precisely because of my higher income’. The Whitlam Government sought to ensure that Australia’s social security system provided an adequate safety net for those in most need, and that the system took account of social reality. The Whitlam Government enacted changes to support the opportunities and security of women, in particular. 

The primary achievement of the Whitlam Government in this area was the creation of Medibank, Australia’s national health insurance system. The system would provide free access to hospitals and a range of other medical services.  The maximum gap between a doctor’s fee and the Medibank rebate was to be $5.  Medibank was designed to provide health coverage for the 17% of Australians who did not have, or could not afford private health insurance.”

 Former Labor Prime Minister Julia Gillard, 5 September, 2003…

Medicare was born in 1984, a health system built by Labor and designed to give every Australian access to affordable health care. Throughout the 1980s, as Medicare gained strength and became the foundation for an equitable health system, John Howard was Medicare’s greatest enemy. Again and again, he declared his opposition to Medicare. When he was leader of the opposition in the 1980s, he said that Medicare was a “miserable, cruel fraud”, a “scandal”, a “total and complete failure”, a “quagmire”, a “total disaster”, a “financial monster” and a “human nightmare”.

He subsequently threatened to “pull Medicare right apart” and to “get rid of the bulk-billing system”. And he said bulk billing was an “absolute rort”. John Howard’s 1987 election commitment stated: “Bulk billing will not be permitted for anyone except the pensioners and the disadvantaged. Doctors will be free to charge whatever fees they choose.”

Liz Jackson‘s interview with John Howard, during the 1996 Election Campaign, for the Four Corners‘ program “An Average Australian Bloke”, first broadcast 19 February, 1996 …

Q. That will be big in this debate, Medicare being the first. When did you change your mind about Medicare?

A. What part of it?

Q. Well for instance, that it was a total disaster, when did you change your view that Medicare was a total disaster?

A. I have … I have accepted for some years now that the Australian people like Medicare and they want to keep it.

Q. When did you change your view that bulk billing was a rort?

A. Once again, the Australian people made a decision that they wanted to keep bulk billing and they therefore … in … on all of these sorts of issues, anybody who has the same view year in and year out, irrespective of the expression of public opinion, is…is stupid.

Q. So you changed your view on bulk billing and Medicare generally because of public opinion?

A. They… public opinion played a very major part on both of those issues, yes. Because… because in public life you have to take account of what the public thinks. You can’t totally ignore it.

Ross Gittins, The Age, May 2003 …

“Although Howard came to office with a promise to preserve Medicare, it’s now clear he has been working to restore a more individualist health care system. He began by seeking to revive private insurance (and, hence, private hospitals) with two sticks and one big carrot: the un-means-tested 30 per cent tax rebate.

In this budget we see him progressing to a plan that would eventually reduce bulk-billing to a safety net for pensioners and other card-holders, while allowing the private funds to insure people for the gap between their doctors’ bills and the Medicare rebate.”

Address by Julia Gillard, Sydney, 2006, NSW Fabian Society Forum John Howard: 10 Years On

“We show our values in our actions. And the gap between Howard’s claimed  values and his values in action is a chasm. The chasm shows in the Howard Government’s Medicare Safety net. The rhetoric was “Strengthening Medicare”, delivered through the highly stylised multi-million dollar campaign design to convince us that John Howard cared about a universal health system.

The policy was meant to help people struggling with their out of pocket health care costs, people who have high health care needs, people with a chronic illness who need to access care on an ongoing basis.

But the reality is a very stark contrast. The policy has fuelled heath inflation, particularly in the areas of obstetrics, which accounts for almost 40 per cent of the Medicare safety net expenditure.

So while the rhetoric was designed to placate the electorate’s concern about the erosion of Medicare, the reality is that the majority of safety net rebates are going to the worried well, the well paid one-off health consumer, not the middle or lower income chronic illness sufferer, trying to manage their diabetes, or asthma, or arthritis or depression. The values that support John Howard’s so-called safety net are values of unfairness, division and exclusion.”

Prime Minister Tony Abbott, February, 2014 …

“As a health minister in a former government, I used to say that government was the best friend Medicare has ever had,” he said.

“This leopard doesn’t change his spots and I want this government, likewise, to be the best friend Medicare has ever had.”

Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey, February 2014 …

If our health and welfare and education systems stay exactly the same, Australia is going to run out of money to pay for them, and we’re either going to have a massive increase in taxes — and that means fewer jobs at the end of the day — or we’re going to have to look at ways we can restructure the system to make it sustainable.”

ABC News, February 2014 …

Dr Jim Gillespie, from the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, says it is unclear what the Coalition’s vision for modernising the Medicare system comprises.

“It’s a little hard to work out because they promised almost nothing in the election campaign,” he said.

“It was very hard to find out what they were planning and a lot of them merging by nudges and winks and little suggestions along the way, but a lot of it seems to be about a very old Liberal hostility towards the universal nature of Medicare.”

Kenneth Davison, The Age, April, 2003 …

Under the cover of the fog of war, the Howard Government is trying to drive the final nail into Medicare as a universal system of financing health care.

Like Malcom Fraser in the 1975 campaign, when he promised to retain Medibank and immediately began dismantling it after the election, John Howard knew that a full frontal attack on Medicare could have cost him the 1996 election.

Our current Prime Minister

Tony Abbott once jokingly described himself as the ideological love child of John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop.

Federal Health Minister, Peter Dutton, The 7.30 Report, February 19, 2014 …

SARAH FERGUSON: You said in your speech today that in the past 10 years the cost of Medicare has increased by 120 per cent, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme by 90 per cent, hospital care by 80 per cent. You say that’s not sustainable and something must be done. What exactly is it that you are planning to do?

PETER DUTTON: Well the first thing that we have to do is have a conversation with the Australian people to say that we want to strengthen and modernise Medicare. It’s a system that, obviously, all Australians, including myself, hold near and dear …

SARAH FERGUSON: And is that going to require a new form of means testing to make that possible?

PETER DUTTON: Well, not necessarily, and again, this is the recommendations that we’ll wait to see from the Commission of Audit. I want to make sure that, for argument’s sake, we have a discussion about you or me on reasonable incomes whether we should expect to pay nothing when we go to see the doctor, when we go to have a blood test, should we expect to pay nothing as a co-contribution and other taxpayers to pick up that bill. I think these are all reasonable discussions for our population to have.

Former Labor Federal Health Minister, Tanya Plibersek

Tony Abbott’s health minister. One interview. The main points:

1. Under Tony Abbott universal healthcare through Medicare is over.

2. Under Tony Abbott ordinary families should be forced pay to see a GP.

3. Under Tony Abbott keeping the junk food industry happy is more important than keeping people healthy.

And we all lived happily ever after.



I am finding it difficult, if not next to nigh on impossible, to write anything intelligent or intelligible about the current Australian government under the stewardship of Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

There appears to be, all across the World Wide Web, article after article, analysis after analysis, comment upon comment, all attempting to grapple with the reality of a government that appears incapable of grappling with the reality of being a government, and is, instead, behaving more like a high school debating team who will only agree to enter into the debate on condition the other team doesn’t turn up. There is no sense to be found in any of this. That way madness lies.

Their policies seem less like policies and more like coded slogans scratched into toilet doors, adorned with “Breakfast of Champions” style graphics of wide-open beavers and jism-spurting cocks.

They are not policies but rather statements of an intent to think about what a policy might be if only they could figure out what the word meant.

I cannot be expected to take these people seriously.

Their every statement, their every pronouncement on a thing is in direct contradiction to every previous statement. There is no through-line whatsoever to the thought-processes involved because there are no actual thoughts being had …

“A certain level of government spending is necessary and good.” Tony Abbott, World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, 2014.

There’s a deep intellect hard at work on our behalf. Aren’t we lucky?

Down the Rabbit Hole, Through the Looking Glass, and up the Yellow Brick Road we go (we are all Scarecrows now) to AnecdoteLand, where facts, evidence, expertise, experience, professionalism, pragmatism, and peer-reviewed research matter little, if at all, to our new Grand Wizard and his Band of Merry Munchkins in this Brave New World of Magical Thinking where Rhonda Byrne’s “The Secret” sits next to Darwin’s “Origin of the Species” on the science shelves in the school library …

From The Independent

“So contemptuous is he of the science behind climate change – of any science, for that matter – that he has not even bothered appointing a science minister.”

These are not intelligent people. These are not smart people. These are people who “believe” and “feel” and offer “thoughts” on things they know nothing of, and then go about making decisions based on these and these alone …

Guy Rundle from New Matilda

“Two obvious points come out of the recent months. The first is that the Abbott government has no real game plan, apart from killing the carbon tax, and stopping the boats, and then a footling series of culture war maneouvres. The real stuff — going up against the union movement, etc is going to be hard, and they’re not in shape for that yet. Truth is, they can’t even manage a culture war, tripping over themselves as different and contradictory initiatives fly every which way.”

There is also a tendency – a compulsive tendency – for our Grand Wizard and his Munchkins to just make shit up about things, lie through their teeth when called on it, and talk complete nonsense …

From The Guardian

[Joe] Hockey said he was told by Toyota Australia’s president, Max Yasuda, in December the company could continue if workers agreed to a new set of conditions.

“The fact is they were very concerned about the conditions that existed at Toyota in Australia,” he told Fairfax radio on Wednesday, adding that this included union “militancy”.

But the company had a different version of events. “Toyota Australia has never blamed the union for its decision to close its manufacturing operations by the end of 2017, neither publicly or in private discussions with any stakeholders,” it said …

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union said the Toyota statement was a “blow to the government’s credibility”.

“It’s unfortunate that companies should have to continue to correct the government’s slander,” the union said. “The government has to stop blaming workers for their policy failures.”

Fat chance.

The workers are the enemy. Die arbeiter have always been the enemy.

Here is Munchkin Abetz talking nonsense about a “30 year war” …

“Federal Employment Minister Eric Abetz is warning of a wages breakout if unions and employers do not act responsibly in negotiating new agreements …

… “Employers and unions must be encouraged to take responsibility for the cost of their deals; not just the cost to the affected enterprises but the overall cost in relation to our economy efficiency and the creation of opportunities for others,” he said.

“If this is not done, then we risk seeing something akin to the wages explosion of the pre-accord era when unsustainable wage growth simply pushed thousands of Australians out of work.””

David Peetz, Professor of Employment Relations at Griffith University calls bullshit

“[D]ata show that wage increases under enterprise agreements are falling. At 3.7%, the growth rate is the lowest in 13 years. It sits below the long-term average, since enterprise bargaining was introduced, of 4.0% from 1992 …

… In other circumstances, strange talk of a wage explosion might have been excused as a rush of blood to the head. But this was no off-the-cuff remark, it was the culmination of a carefully scripted speech. And indeed there is nothing new about unsubstantiated talk of wages explosions. In April 2007, former treasurer Peter Costello warned that amending the Workplace Relations Act would lead to a wage explosion. It didn’t. From 2008 News Limited ran stories and regularly editorialised on a forthcoming wages breakout that never materialised.

The reference in the speech to a wage explosion was no more impromptu than the 12 mentions of war littered throughout it. War seems to be a popular word at the moment. Most references in the speech were to the “30 years war” over industrial relations – a “war” it appears Minister Abetz does not yet see as being over.

People may speculate over who is the target of the war. But one possibility is that part of it is a war on facts.”

Never let a fact get in the way of a good war, especially if it’s one being waged by the righteous warriors of the Right. Just don’t mention Iraq.

Here is a fact, courtesy of The Australia Institute

“The typical full-time employee in Australia works 70 minutes of unpaid overtime a day. This equates to 33 eight-hour days per year, or six and a half standard working weeks. Something for nothing – unpaid overtime in Australia examines the nature, extent and consequences of Australia’s heavy reliance on unpaid overtime. Across the workforce, the 2.14 billion hours of unpaid overtime worked per year is a $72 billion gift to employers, equivalent to 6 per cent of all economic activity in Australia.”

Work is not, as Joe Hockey and Eric Abetz appear to believe, a form of “national service”, a personal sacrifice we citizens make to secure in perpetuity the prosperity of the Ruling Classes.

It is what we do so that we may live.

“You know, I’ve been around the ruling class all my life, and I’ve been quite aware of their total contempt for the people of the country.” Gore Vidal – Interview with Paul Jay, The Real News, July 5, 2009.

This is a Government of Hatred, a Government of Contempt for those who dare to question, to challenge, who dare inquire, who dare to think.

It is a government in thrall to cults of “belief”.

We know they are liars. We know they are hypocrites. We know they are cowards.

We know they are inept, incapable, ignorant. We know they are stupid, shallow, dumb. We know all this.


Not one word of criticism, not one syllable, not a whisper will they hear.

“To a conservative, intuition is as important as reasoning, instinct as important as intellect. A way of life has far more demonstrative power to a conservative than a brilliant argument.” – Tony Abbott, “Battlelines”

“While conservatives may preach the dignity of work, their actual agenda is to deny lower-income workers as much dignity – and personal freedom – as possible” Paul Krugman, Nobel Laureate in Economics.

They are beyond good. They are beyond evil. They are beyond ethics. They are beyond morality.

It is Kristallnacht in Australia.

For the worker, for the low-paid, for women, for the infirm, the ill, unions, teachers, public schools, public hospitals, Medicare, industry, science , public broadcasting, the arts, public servants, immigrants, refugees, environmentalists, the environment itself, the land, the water.

The end of dissent. The end of truth. The end of society.

Tony Abbott has now become a God.

Of vengeance.


Why does a box of soap have “Open other end” on it? What difference does it make, it’s a BOX, all you need is what’s IN it.

What’s going to happen you open it the “WRONG” end, your FACE blows off??


*I mean, for FUCK’S SAKE.



This guy on that guy …

And then there’s this guy …

Once we had Prime Ministers who were men. Now we have a mouse.

A mouse who roars …

Indonesia believes Tony Abbott may be deliberately inflaming tensions between the two countries for political reasons and to allow his government to continue turning back asylum seeker boats …

… Government spokesman Agus Barnas said Mr Abbott’s blunt comments in Davos about sovereignty ”will only worsen the prospects” of trying to normalise relations.

”It may be [that Prime Minister Abbott is deliberately making inflammatory statements] because he’s tied to his campaign promises,” said Mr Agus, the spokesman for co-ordinating security minister Djoko Suyanto.

”Maybe he is also receiving big pressure domestically, but turning back boats is not the answer, because that only benefits one party, namely Australia.”

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s special adviser for political affairs, Daniel Sparringa, agreed Mr Abbott was being deliberately provocative. “He has done more damage than good. Such a pity.””


Happy ‘Straya Day. Might be the last one.


From The Age, January 15, 2014

Navy personnel carrying out border protection were quietly stripped of some workplace safety protections and obligations last month in an apparent preparation for dangerous operations such as turning back boats.

The Chief of the Defence Force, General David Hurley, used his powers under workplace safety laws shortly before Christmas to exempt Navy sailors from their obligation to take ”reasonable care” to ensure their own safety and that of other sailors and asylum-seekers.

The change aims to give sailors legal protection, meaning they would ”not face individual criminal sanctions under the Act for giving effect to Government policy”, an explanatory statement issued by General Hurley states.

General Hurley acted in consultation with Employment Minister Eric Abetz to make the change, which effectively puts the sailors on a similar footing to military personnel fighting in battle …

A leading industrial law expert, Professor Ron McCallum of the University of Sydney, blasted the workplace change, saying it seemed squarely aimed at carrying out the government’s turnback policy.

”Navy personnel work very hard and I mean no criticism of them … but this is not a war situation,” he said. ”I think it’s a pity to alter those laws and any turnback policy should be ensuring refugees and sailors are safe.”


From The Sydney Morning Herald, January 8, 2014

Most Australians think asylum seekers who arrive by boat are not genuine refugees and there is strong support for the Abbott government to treat boat arrivals more harshly.

A nationwide opinion poll by UMR Research shows that 59 per cent of people think most boat arrivals are not genuine refugees.

The poll, based on a nationally representative sample of 1000 online interviews, shows only 30 per cent of Australians believe that most asylum seekers are genuine refugees while 12 per cent are unsure.

A strong majority of Australians, 60 per cent, also want the Abbott government to “increase the severity of the treatment of asylum seekers.””

The Prime Minister has listened to the people.

Sailors can now beat the shit out of refugees with iron bars and cattle prods if they so choose.

Or shoot them.

Vive liberté!


From various artists …

November 2013

“The New South Wales Government has ruled out allowing terminally-ill people to legally use cannabis to manage pain.

In May, a cross-party parliamentary committee unanimously recommended allowing terminally-ill patients and people with AIDS to legally use up to 15 grams of marijuana for medicinal purposes.

But the O’Farrell Government has rejected the recommendation, saying there is limited evidence about the efficiency of cannabis for medical purposes and it does not support the use of unregulated cannabis products.

Laurence Mather, Emeritus Professor of Anaesthesia at the University of Sydney, spent 40 years working in the field of pain management. 

“I’m very disappointed the government dismissed the evidence that was there,” he said.

“The evidence keeps coming in and gets stronger as the years go by”

“This is a lot safer than many of the medications that are used at the moment, I really don’t quite get where the government is coming from.””

January 2014

Eight-year-old Tara was having up to 60 seizures a day but has made a miraculous recovery since her mother , Cheri started giving her liquid cannabis made in Nimbin.

Doctors at one of Victoria’s leading hospitals have acknowledged the “remarkable improvements” in the girl’s condition one year after she started taking the drug.

But Health Minister David Davis has warned families not to use medicinal marijuana, saying it remains illegal in Victoria and that the Government “does not intend to change this legislation”.

A Sunday Herald Sun investigation has found that up to 10 Victorian children, some as young as three, are taking daily doses of medicinal marijuana – in some cases administered by teachers – as desperate parents turn their back on pharmaceutical drugs.

Cheri O’Connell gives her daughter Tara a liquid form of medicinal marijuana known as THC-A – which is posted to her in the mail – to treat her severe epilepsy.”

January 2014

Reduced pub trading hours in Sydney’s Kings Cross would not have prevented an attack that has left an 18-year-old man critically injured, New South Wales Premier Barry O’Farrell says.

Builder Shaun McNeil, 25, has been charged over a king hit to Daniel Christie while the teenager was out celebrating New Year’s Eve with his older brother.

Mr Christie was attacked close to where Thomas Kelly was fatally punched in 2012, and the latest incident has again raised questions about the State Government’s response to alcohol-fuelled violence.

Acting Opposition Leader Linda Burney says the Government must follow the example set in Newcastle, where no shots are served after 10pm, no patrons are allowed into a venue after 1am and no alcohol can be sold after 3am.

“I’m of a very strong view that we have to at least trial this policy to see whether or not the same outcomes that Newcastle experienced, and that was less violence, can be achieved in Sydney,” Ms Burney said.

A study by Professor Kypros Kypri from the University of Newcastle found a 37 per cent fall in alcohol-related violence when the restrictions were introduced there.”

January 2014

Exclusive: Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s plea to end drunken street violence across Australia

“LIKE most Australians, I enjoy a drink on social occasions.

However, as a father and as a citizen, I’m appalled by the violent binge drinking culture that now seems so prevalent, especially at “hot spots” in our big cities.

I’m sick of the fact that alcohol-fuelled violence has turned places that should be entertainment precincts into “no-go zones”.

Hospital emergency departments should not be overflowing with the victims of substance abuse every Friday and Saturday night. The media should not be full of stories about the latest casualties from our own streets.

We need community solutions between police, local government, pubs and clubs and residents. Some communities have already demonstrated that progress can be made and many pubs, clubs and alcohol providers have discovered it is better to solve a problem and be part of the solution, than have a solution imposed on them.

We have to approach this in a way that makes our streets safer. That means resisting the idea one single action will change everything; that one group is responsible for this problem or one politician has the answer or is the cause. While this is not an easy area, with much control in the hands of state and local governments, the Commonwealth stands ready to work with the states, parents and communities. to tackle this scourge.”

November 2013

One of the nation’s oldest health organisations has been placed in voluntary administration after its funding was cut by the government.

The Alcohol and Other Drugs Council of Australia, which has operated since 1966, learned on Monday its funding would cease immediately. The council is the peak body for organisations working to minimise the harm caused by drugs and alcohol, providing professional development, information sharing and advocacy services on an annual budget of $1.6 million from the federal Health Department.

 President of the council’s board, former Liberal MP Mal Washer, said the decision was a ”devastating blow” that would undermine years of work.

”It effectively erases decades of corporate knowledge, and leaves the sector without representation at a national level,” Dr Washer said.

“In 46 years, this is the only government that has decided it can do without ADCA’s advice”, Professor Ian Webster.

July 2013

Strict guidelines proposed for the sale of alcohol in NSW have been watered down to remove bans on the use of celebrities who appeal to under-18s in promotions and mention of specific events targeting women after intense lobbying from the industry.

New guidelines released by the NSW government on Thursday morning show sections pertaining to the promotion of alcohol to minors, promotions deemed “indecent and offensive” and rules for the discounting of alcohol have been rewritten compared with draft guidelines established in August last year.

As previously revealed by Fairfax Media, the section dealing with “extreme discounts” on alcohol such as those offered in “shopper docket” offers by Coles and Woolworths has also been rewritten.

In particular, a proposed ban on promotions which offer discounts on alcohol greater than 50 per cent has been dropped.”

January 2014

The O’Farrell government’s reluctance to consider pub lockouts and earlier closing times to drive down alcohol-fuelled violence has inevitably led to the charge it is in the pocket of the hotel industry.

And it’s easy to understand why, given the close ties between politics and pubs in this state.

For starters, the chief executive of the NSW branch of the Australian Hotels Association, Paul Nicolaou, is a former Liberal candidate who for many years ran the state party’s fund-raising arm, the Millennium Forum.

He also happens to be close to the minister responsible for liquor licensing matters in NSW, George Souris.

Then there is the party powerbroker Michael Photios, who runs the dominant left faction of the NSW Liberals.

To capitalise on the election of a Coalition government he established a political lobbying firm, Premier State. The AHA is a key client.

Now factor in the hundreds of thousands of dollars the AHA donated to the NSW Liberal Party shortly before the 2011 election, and a damning picture begins to emerge.

So it’s little wonder that accusations fly when Souris and Barry O’Farrell rule out the measures being called for by the police union, senior doctors and emergency services workers: 1am lockouts and 3am closing times for pubs.

Yet the government has point blank refused to commit to a trial of the measure experts say will have the greatest impact – lockouts and earlier closing times – even if only in the violence hotspots of Kings Cross and central Sydney.

Central to the government’s argument is that a 1am lockout would not have prevented the death of 18-year-old Thomas Kelly, who was hit about 10pm in Kings Cross in July 2012.

But the upswell of outrage is not solely about so-called ”king-hits” or ”coward punches” fuelled by alcohol.

It is an outpouring of frustration at the state of Kings Cross and central Sydney any time after dark each weekend.

As long as the government continues to rule out a trial of lockouts, coupled with a serious analysis of its effect, its credibility is likely to remain shot on the issue.””

January 2014, ABC “AM”

TONY EASTLEY: A senior policeman based in Sydney’s Kings Cross is describing the New South Wales Government policies on alcohol related violence as deceitful and beholden to a powerful lobby.

In the past few weeks, several cases of bashings have put the issue in the spotlight.

Inspector Pat Gooley says the Government is ignoring a proven solution because its implementation would upset the powerful hotels industry.

Inspector Gooley is vice-president of the [NSW] state Police Association

TOM NIGHTINGALE: What do you think of the New South Wales Government efforts to tackle it?

PAT GOOLEY: Look, I think what they’re doing is really fluffing around the edges. We’re calling for the introduction of what’s referred to as the Newcastle model, what’s been tried and tested in Newcastle. It’s been trialled and it’s been proven and it works and we say it is certainly well past due to bring those trials or those measures in.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Why do you think it’s not happening then?

PAT GOOLEY: I can only speculate on that. You know we’ve seen things about us being a global city, about tourism, about the loss of revenue to the government and to publicans – what price do we put on a young blokes life?

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Do you think that the Premier Barry O’Farrell, the Hospitality Minister in New South Wales, George Souris, do you think they are genuine in trying to do what they can to address alcohol related violence?

PAT GOOLEY: No, look I don’t think they are. I think it’s, um, as I said the Newcastle measures have been tried and tested.

Who needs professors and doctors and research and evidence and expert advice and commentary from qualified professionals when we’ve got such giants of political thought and intellectual acuity as Barry O’Farrell and Tony Abbott to sort all this shit out and solve it for us?




Prime Minister Tony Abbott on 2GB, interviewed by Andrew Moore, January 9, 2014…


… But the important thing for us is that we do STOP THE BOATS Andrew. I mean this is a non-negotiable for us. This is for us, a matter of our sovereignty.

Now, I absolutely understand Indonesia’s concern for its sovereignty and I fully respect Indonesia’s sovereignty. There is no way on God’s earth that any Australian government – particularly a government that I lead – would in way trespass on Indonesia’s sovereignty.

But, but, when these BOATS KEEP COMING ILLEGALLY to our country, that is a sovereignty issue for us.

It is absolutely non-negotiable. THESE BOATS WILL STOP. THESE BOATS WILL STOP and we will do whatever is necessary, consistent with our international obligations and ordinary decency, to STOP THE BOATS and that’s exactly what we are doing.


You’ve campaigned about that loudly and for a long time – well before the election campaign – you’ve done it for years in opposition and the same with Scott Morrison. I understand the decision taken by the Immigration Minister and your Government not to run a daily commentary on BOATS ARRIVING here, because you don’t want to encourage people smugglers obviously in Indonesia.


And we don’t want to give rise to a whole lot of mischief making. And I’d rather be criticised for being a bit of a closed-book on this issue and actually STOP THE BOATS.

And that’s the point, the point is not to provide sport for public discussion. The point is to STOP THE BOATS and I am pleased to say that it is now several weeks since we have had a BOAT and the less that we talk about operational details on the water the better when it comes to STOPPING THE BOATS.


The only thing I would put to you is why not announce or talk about the fact that you have SENT BOATS BACK if you have? Whether it is one, two, five, ten or none? Because does that not serve the purpose of not commenting daily on BOAT ARRIVALS in terms of being the opposite effect of promoting it for people smugglers saying this is what is going to happen?


Well Andrew, if BOATS WERE COMING at the rate of 50,000 illegal arrivals a year which was the case in July and if not they are hardly coming at all obviously some things have changed.

Now, the important thing is that the measures have been put in place which have dramatically SLOWED BOAT ARRIVALS - that is the important thing …

Everyone got the message?


“Catch-22″ by Joseph Heller

Major Major Major Major

The squadron commander of the base in Pianosa, who was named Major Major Major by his father as a joke and was later made a Major by an IBM machine with a sense of humor similar to his father’s. He is disliked by most of the enlisted men in Pianosa because he was promoted so suddenly and he chooses to remain isolated from the other people at the base, letting Sergeant Towser handle the operations of the base. He doesn’t allow people to see him in his office while he is in his office, they can only see him when he isn’t there …

The Guardian

The immigration minister, Scott Morrison, is coming under increasing pressure to confirm or deny reports that the Australian navy has recently turned back one or more asylum seeker boats towards Indonesian waters.

The ABC reports that Indonesian police said two asylum seeker boats had been turned back by Australian forces since December.

But Morrison said in a statement that he would not “disclose, confirm or otherwise comment on reports of on-water activities”.


“With a little ingenuity and vision, he had made it all but impossible for anyone in the squadron to talk to him, which was just fine with everyone, he noticed, since no one wanted to talk to him anyway”, Chapter 9, Catch-22, Joseph Heller


“On Offence” Richard King (2013)

“The Year My Politics Broke” Jonathan Green (2013)

Here is SA Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi getting his rabid little rattle on

“Given the increasing number of ‘non-traditional’ families there is a temptation to equate all family structures as being equal or relative,” he says.

“Why then the levels of criminality among boys and promiscuity among girls who are brought up in single-parent families, more often than not headed by a single mother?

“It is perfectly reasonable and rational, therefore, for the state, if it is to have a role in social policy and the affairs of marriage, to reinforce and entrench those aspects of traditional marriage that work, not undermine them and promote ‘alternatives’ which have led to social chaos.

“Competent social policy should be drafted by those who understand the primacy of natural law and who are able to see patterns in society.”

That would be Mr. Bernardi, one takes it.

There’s a curiously Aryan quality to Bernardi’s bouncy thought-bubbles of ideological fantasy and tidy social order – The “State” subjugating women to be child-bearing wives and mothers by its – or His – divine decree and executive order, whilst shunning “alternatives”, as he puts it, off to socio-economic and moral ghettoes of government-endorsed disapproval. The “faggots” and the “whores”, the “intellectual elite” no doubt (I have no fucking idea who these people are, the “intellectual elite”). The Muslims …

Sally Neighbour in The Monthly

“While he seems to be sincere in his convictions, the foundations of Bernardi’s ‘philosophy’ appear shallow. He claims to be widely read but admits his favourite fare is airport novels, especially the late Dick Francis’ formulaic thrillers. His recommended reading list includes a book called Confrontational Politics by a retired US senator, HL Richardson, published by the Gun Owners Foundation. The author’s credo is “pro-life, pro-gun, pro-God” and he was once voted ‘Chauvinist of the Year’ by the National Organization for Women. His book is a crude polemic that rails against homosexuals, tree-huggers, humanists, pagans and abortionists, whom he likens to Hitler. It calls evolution a “scientific justification” for rejecting God, and argues for “the necessity to limit the power of man and government” as the Holy Bible should be the basis for human law (a proposition starkly similar to that advanced by the Islamists Bernardi condemns). Bernardi liked the book so much he bought 100 copies to hand out.”

There you go. The man is a total dribbly fucking idiot, but like most idiots he thinks he’s The Smartest Guy in The Room, bless’d by Divinity, in possession of all the answers to life, love and liberty, and he’ll keep shouting and shouting at people and shouting and shouting and shouting until someone either hits him and tells him to fuck off or threatens to call the police.

After which, he’ll probably creep back later in the night to blow up your bloody house.

In extracts of Bernardi’s new book, reported on by the ABC, he argues some women use abortion as “an abhorrent form of birth control” and he finds it “horrendous and unacceptable” that the abortion “death industry despatches 80,000 to 100,000 unborn children [in Australia] every year”.

In a televised interview, Bernardi said he did not want to ban abortion, but “there is a right to life issue we should be exploring” and he believed life began at conception. He also brushed off queries about the accuracy of his abortion figures, saying the practice happened “a lot” and he did not know anyone who wanted to see more abortions.”

“A lot”.

Argument lost right fucking there.

From The Monthly again …

“He wants to be some sort of conservative warrior but he’s not up to it intellectually,” says a Liberal associate. “In reality he’s like the kid in the playground who pulls his pants down so everyone will look at him, but he has no idea how he’s embarrassing himself in the process. He’s basically kryptonite for any serious person in the party because he’s a complete embarrassment.”

There is little point in being “offended” by anything Bernardi has to say, or has said in the past, or calling for his immediate resignation, or calling him a disgrace, or some form of censure to be imposed upon him, because what he has to “say” could be slapped down in an instant by “facts”, by actual “research” if any so-called “journalist” bothered to bone up and actually do some, and this is the central idea behind Richard King’s book “On Offence”, that in frantically flapping about in a huffy snit, the actual debate, the real things people should be talking about gets lost in an hysterical muddle of exclamation points and capital letters and shrilly confected outrage, sans much punctuation.

It’s also a point made in Jonathan Green’s “The Year My Politics Broke”, where a commercial (and public) media, hungry for an everlasting bowl of quick and instant tasty headlines, stops to question and confront politicians and public figures when they talk complete shit and call them on it by asking them to back up their shit with some evidence and substantiated fact. Or go out and find some themselves.

Barack Obama, 2012 “You are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts” .

Green looks back on the last few unhinged years of Australian politics and political reporting and believes both are broken, and I cannot help but agree with him. I have not met a single person in life, actual life, whether they be friends, or through work, but in life, who ever said a word to me (or me to them) about the travails of MP’s Peter Slipper or Craig Thomson or what former PM Julia Gillard may or may not have done twenty years ago, simply because no one in real life gave a fuck. Nor do they now.

Yet, that is what our media gave us over that particular and very peculiar period of time. That, and endless polls, and gossip about rumours, rumours about gossip, speculation about rumours of gossip, gotcha photographs, gotcha gaffes, and lots and lots and lots of opinion about things such as these from people I couldn’t give a fuck about either.

I’m expected to pay money to read this shit?

I’ll take my news with actual news in it, thank you very much, not the self-righteous, self-obsessed pseudo-puritanical ramblings and reflections of these packs of crusty old fuckwits from the olden-day Jurassic Parks of Print and their now all-too obvious penchant for writing crap about nothing that actually matters, and nothing about the things that do, because it’s easier for them.

“Journalism”, my arse.

Cory Bernardi’s mind doesn’t stretch too far from that of Anders Behring Breivik in many respects, but if one were to make that comparison and present it to him in public – even dare write it or speak it – Poor Cory would probably  go all squirrelly in the head with outrage, demand all manner of apologies, talk about his right to “freedom of speech” being oppressed by Commies and Queers, Lesbian Nazis from the Dark Side of the Moon even, and his supporters and pimps and promoters in the press would squeal with offended indignation on his behalf until everybody forgot what started it off in the first place. Just as Richard King illustrates time and time again in his book.

Rather than being “offended” by Bernardi, he needs to proven the idiot he is by being pummelled with facts, none of which he would be in the least likely to accept as fact, but, as Jonathan Green points out, our media seem far too timid to confront politicians and public figures talking batshit-crazy bullshit because they’re far too busy burrowing for political Christmas party gossip or speculation that, more often than not, turns out to be no more substantive than smoke rings, leaving nought but a bad smell in the air, and ash on the carpet.

Politics? Broken.

The Media? Pissweak. Trivialities. Tits.

Cory Bernardi?

“I believe Europe should strive for: A cultural conservative approach where monoculturalism, moral, the nuclear family, a free market, support for Israel and our Christian cousins of the east, law and order and Christendom itself must be central aspects (unlike now).” – Anders Behring Breivik, his “manifesto”, p. 650.

PS - Here are some “reviews” of Cory’s book, “The Conservative Revolution” from Amazon.


Stand-up comedian/polemicist Lenny Bruce, 1963 …

“Are there any niggers here tonight?

Could you turn on the house lights, please, and could the waiters and waitresses just stop serving, just for a second? And turn off this spot. Now what did he say? “Are there any niggers here tonight?”

I know there’s one nigger, because I see him back there working. Let’s see, there’s two niggers. And between those two niggers sits a kyke. And there’s another kyke— that’s two kykes and three niggers. And there’s a spic. Right? Hmm? There’s another spic. Ooh, there’s a wop; there’s a polack; and, oh, a couple of greaseballs. And there’s three lace-curtain Irish micks. And there’s one, hip, thick, hunky, funky, boogie. Boogie boogie. Mm-hmm. I got three kykes here, do I hear five kykes? I got five kykes, do I hear six spics, I got six spics, do I hear seven niggers? I got seven niggers. Sold American. I pass with seven niggers, six spics, five micks, four kykes, three guineas, and one wop.

Well, I was just trying to make a point, and that is that it’s the suppression of the word that gives it the power, the violence, the viciousness. Dig: if President Kennedy would just go on television, and say, “I would like to introduce you to all the niggers in my cabinet,” and if he’d just say “nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger” to every nigger he saw, “boogie boogie boogie boogie boogie,” “nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger” ’til nigger didn’t mean anything anymore, then you could never make some six-year-old black kid cry because somebody called him a nigger at school.”

Federal Attorney-General George Brandis, 2013 …

“According to The Australian, the new Attorney-General’s first legislative act will be to repeal the prohibition, in section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, on behaviour likely to offend or insult a person or group of people on the basis of their race, colour or national or ethnic origin. It may seem an unlikely starting point, but section 18C attracted much critical attention after it was used in a civil action against conservative columnist Andrew Bolt for comments he made about numerous individuals of Aboriginal descent. The claimants won their case, leading Bolt to complain that his freedom of speech had been denied by the law’s prohibition on giving offence.

That view was shared by Brandis, who made no bones about his plan to amend the act should the Coalition win government. “You cannot have a situation in a liberal democracy in which the expression of an opinion is rendered unlawful because somebody else … finds it offensive or insulting,” Brandis said. The Attorney-General isn’t ruling out repealing section 18C altogether, which would remove the prohibition on actions that humiliate or intimidate people on the basis of race or ethnicity.”

Fifty years after Lenny Bruce first lay down the gauntlet, Federal Attorney-General George Brandis has so bravely and boldly picked it up and done whatever it is a person does with a gauntlet when they pick it up.

After years of foul and unjust oppression from the forces of the politically correct socialist left, very shortly Australians everywhere will reclaim their right to call black men “coons”, Asians “chinks”, and Muslims nothing but a bunch of fucking raghead terrorists.

Hooray for freedom.


My emphases …

November 11, 2013

“The federal government’s top business adviser has criticised the cost of the National Disability Insurance Scheme and the school funding reforms, slammed wages as too high and industrial relations as being too rigid, and urged the government to push the envelope in order to “repair” the economy.

In a fiery speech on Monday night, Maurice Newman, the head of the Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council, lamented as “hasty” Tony Abbott’s pre-election promises to quarantine such areas as health and defence from budget cuts and suggested the Prime Minister “disturb the comfort zones of many’’ to pay down debt and cut the deficit as soon as possible …

… “There’s no point in beating around the bush, worthy though the causes may be, in the circumstances, it was reckless.’’ He stopped short of suggesting the Coalition abolish the policies …

… Mr Newman echoed the concerns of his peers that the cost of business was too high. He singled out over-regulation, anti-competitive practices and wages, noting that Australia’s minimum wage was well above that in the US, Canada , Europe and New Zealand. This was compounded by the IR laws.”

November 12, 2013

The Coalition government is distancing itself from controversial comments by Prime Minister Tony Abbotts top business adviser, who said that wages were too high and the government could not afford education and disability funding promises.

Education minister Christopher Pyne said he did not think the government shared the views expressed on Monday night by Mr Abbott’s handpicked adviser, the former ABC chairman Maurice Newman…

…Asked whether he agreed that wages were too high, Mr Pyne told ABC radio that Mr Newman’s job was to “give frank and fearless advice to the government” but it did not mean that the government would always agree with him

…”That’s what it is, it’s advice,” Mr Pyne said. “It doesn’t mean that the government will always take it”

Christopher Pyne. A man true to his word, as we know.

December 4, 2013

The Coalition’s pro-business agenda will transform the country within a few years, Tony Abbott has vowed, as he called on the business community to “campaign” against those trying to stop the new government from implementing its policies.

“Australia will be quite different in a few years’ time because a Coalition rather than a Labor government has been calling the shots, and calling them with a preference for freedom,” he said.

I am confident that the BCA will continue to tell the government what it should do: repeal the carbon tax, repeal the mining tax, cut red tape and get the budget back under control,” he said.

“Even more importantly, I hope that the BCA will campaign against everyone who is trying to stop the government from putting that good advice into practice.

“The government’s job is to make it easier for our good businesses to do their best,” he said.

“Certainly, when I look at a business audience, any business audience, I don’t see people who exploit workers, rip off customers and damage the environment.”

Let the disenfranchisement of the proletariat begin.


“Debt ceiling”.



That’s an American thing.

Isn’t it?

I didn’t know it was an Australian thing.

I’m confused.

I’m very confused. People are speaking of things they’ve not spoken of before. Threatening things. People are speaking of things they say they’ve not spoken of, but if they have, they’ve spoken words misheard, and then they GO SPEAK THEM ALL OVER AGAIN.

People are holding up photographs of people holding photographs with PEOPLE HOLDING PHOTOGRAPHS IN THEM …

People are speaking of treason. Of treachery. Of betrayal. Collusion with enemies, a foul conspiracy of dunces threatening our national security that could send us off to war with little brown savages on distant and primitive isles.

People do a thing, and then a couple years later, other people come along and undo that thing, and then they go and do it the VERY SAME WAY AGAIN.

You could go nuts thinking about this stuff. Couldn’t you, Cory?

Mad Cory




When I wish to learn about a thing, I will seek out the teachings of those who have not only learnt that thing, but made it their career, perhaps their entire life’s work.

By communicating their teachings via whatever medium they offer and I choose to engage with, I may be informed on that thing, but it does not make me an expert on it.

It makes me a layman, or layperson if you want to be fussy, and I may have a few thoughts and theories of my own about this thing that I have learnt, but these are not expert thoughts and theories, just random interpretations of random bits of information rolling about my mind like little woody tumbleweeds stuck with beetle dung.

I am an expert in my own field of work, having done it for roughly 35 years now*, so if somebody who has not done this type of work tries to tell me how to do it and according to what rules, I will not so politely tell them to shut up and go fuck themselves with 40 sticks, maybe even a mallet.

This is not arrogance. It is confidence. I know what I am doing and how to do it.

I’d want to after 35 years.

Which leads me to this …

I am fed up to the bloody back teeth with stupid people talking nonsense about things they know nothing of.

I am fed up to the bloody back teeth being expected to admit the nonsense these stupid people are talking is not in fact stupid, but an alternative opinion or approach, and they have every right to talk this nonsense because freedom of speech leftie intellectual elitist oppression..

Which leads me to this …

Christopher Pyne has a Bachelor of Laws, was once President of Adelaide University Liberal Club, a research assistant to Senator Amanda Vanstone, President of the South Australian Young Liberals, and began practising as a solicitor in 1991. He was Shadow Education minister for 5 years. During this time, he asked only 3 questions in parliament, developed no education policy, and was expelled from Parliament a record 26 times for being “unruly”.

Why is he a “Federal Education Minister”?

Because fuckedifiknow.

Christopher Pyne is an elite repository of a very special kind of stupid. I mean this in the most literal sense. That his is an uninvolved, uncomplicated and base intelligence, frozen in adolescence and improbable ideologies, moved to childish taunts and giggles at fart noises, convinced he possesses talents he does not, and intent upon unleashing those “talents” as he, and only he sees fit in areas he has no experience in, or knowledge of whatsoever.

We get this

The federal education minister says he is too busy to sit down with an expert panel and have its needs-based school funding model explained to him.”

Then this …

I am the national Education Minister, there needs to be a national model that is fair to all states and territories and that is equitable to students and that is what we will achieve.””

Then this …

The Abbott government has performed another U-turn on school funding, indicating it will substantially retain Labor’s Gonski-inspired model over the next four years.

Pyne, who last week said the Labor model was “unimplementable” and flagged the development of a new model to apply after next year, now says the Coalition has “no plan to alter the way that the model will be delivered in the signatory states into the future”.”

The man is a complete fucking idiot.

I have no qualms in encouraging the career aspirations of eager little fellas like Christopher, but if you want to be an astronaut, you can’t just whack a suit on and jump into a rocketship and off to Mars without putting an awful lot of work into it first, and knowing a whole bunch of things about space and planets and science and facts and shit.

If Christopher wants to pass his exams, he needs to pull his tightly-coiffed head out his tidy little arse and start paying attention to the grown-ups in this world, or he’ll find himself not just spending a whole heap of time in the naughty corner, but getting his head repeatedly dunked into the dunnies by the senior boys at break until he learns to fucking well behave.





People are talking about things I don’t agree with and I think they should stop.

I know what I know. I have values and I have convictions, and I know what I know, and I know what is right, and if it’s right for me, that’s all I need.

I don’t want your difference.

We have very good people in charge of very important things, and they do these things on our behalf, and our benefit, and for the welfare of this country, its future, its security and safety, and I think we should shut up and learn how to behave and just let them get on with their jobs.

The government is in charge, and it’s in charge because we put them there – to be the government and govern and tell us what to damn well do.

That’s its job. To tell us what to do, and how to do it, and how much to do it for, and for how long, and why and for who.

If the so-called experts were so bloody expert at things, they’d be in charge, but they’re not, are they?

No, they are not.

So I wish all these other people would just shut up.

There’s a time and a place for everything, and this is not it.



I don’t know where that came from or who or what it’s referring to, but if “manners are the clearest window into the character of people”, the person who sent it is probably a bit of a cunt.


In high school during the early 1970’s, I recall two name-calling, finger-pointing and corridor-shoving bullies who’d pal around with each other, and one of Their Favourite Things, whenever they spied someone to whom they had taken a dislike – which included myself and the half-dozen or so people I’d hang out with – was to point, and shout ‘POOFTER! LOOK, HE’S GOT A STIFFIE!” and then collapse in giggly laughter and walk off together, a beautiful friendship, comrades in their complexity of thought and profundity of speech.

The Herald-Sun’s Andrew “Whistler’s Motherfucker” Bolt reminds me of this …



… lurching and leaping from one confected Socialist State of Siege to another – criminal refugees;  climate change conspiracies; evil Muslims in our midst; attacks on his good self – all of them orchestrated by the shadowy Forces of the Left, savages all, souls empty of basic human decencies, they gather in the hills and deep desert of our beloved homelands, waging foul and barbaric War upon the Minds and Spirits of the Good Folk and Gentle People of our Towns and Villages, spreading the most vicious of defamations, smears and slurs, tearing at the tender fabric of our society, our most sacred of lores and traditions …



It’s like a jungle out there …

The crisis in relations with Indonesia has been caused by Leftist news outlets reporting on spying carried out under a Labor Government.

But Tony Abbott must be made to look bad in some way. The Leftist ABC last night got a Leftist to suggest one …

… Abbott hatred is distorting reporting and adding to our tensions with Indonesia. Fairfax and the ABC are out of control.”

And …

Fairfax’s loathing for Tony Abbott has led to a string of reports in which he is blamed for the failings of others …

“Fairfax is out of control.”

… Fairfax and the ABC have declared war on the Abbott Government, and seem prepared to stop at nothing to drag it down.”

“There is a crack in everything.
That’s how the light gets in” (Leonard Cohen)

There are no cracks in Andrew …



Criticism is attack. Inquiry a brazen affront. Reportage a betrayal. Truth a thoughtcrime.

120 million Americans believe Lizard People run their country.

One million people read Andrew Bolt’s blog.

One makes as much sense as the other.


Welcome to Australia.

We kill children.

“Worse than anything else she has seen, though, is the condition of one child about four years old who has become catatonic and is refusing to eat.

”I have no experience to deal with this,” she says, ”other than report it to my line manager who says she has reported it to hers but nothing is happening.””

We torture them.

“The immigration minister, Scott Morrison, says it is “common practice” for asylum seekers to be separated from their newborns overnight when the babies are in hospital.

The minister released a statement following a Fairfax media report on Thursday that an asylum seeker from Burma had been separated from her baby boy at night and forced to return to a Brisbane detention facility …

… Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said there was “no reasonable excuse” for the separation of an asylum seeker from her newborn child overnight.

“It is inhumane and senselessly callous,” she told reporters in Canberra.

“Would this be something that any of us would wish on our sisters, on people’s wives, on their own mothers?””

We fuck them up.

“Several sources have described harrowing scenes on Christmas Island last month when Immigration officers forced two unaccompanied Sri Lankan children aged 12 and 14 on to a plane to return home. They were part of a group of 84 Tamils who had arrived on the Coco Islands after 34 days at sea and within 48 hours were put on a plane and sent back to Colombo.

”The children were crying and screaming and begging to be able to stay,” said a witness. ”One of the security officers realised they were too young and no one was accompanying them and so took them off the plane. Then there was a stand-off while someone rang Canberra and were instructed by someone very, very senior to put them back on the plane.””

This is our message to you.

This is a message from the Federal Government of Australia.

“One Immigration source on Christmas Island described how much things had changed since Operation Sovereign Borders began on September 18. ”We have been told that we are not to engage with the clients now,” she said.

”So the only message we are told to give them is to leave. We are deliberately intimidating them, we are told to tell them Nauru and Manus are full up and so their only and best option is to go home.”

We will subject them to deprivations.

We will infest their tender flesh with tortures. We will rupture their souls. We will dissever their hearts. We will exorcise them of all hope.

We will confuse them. We will confound them.

We will not explain why we are doing this to them, but we will do it.

Until they break.

Until you understand.

Our sovereignty shall not be violated.

You shall not come here.

We will kill your children.

You shall not come here.

Do you understand?


I solemnly swear,
This pledge of loyalty to our government, to whom I humbly offer my devotion.
This pledge of loyalty to you, Our Leader, to whom I humbly offer my adoration.
And this pledge of loyalty to our Great Party, to whose unerring authority I shall always yield.

I swear that, from this day forth,
What Our Party believe to be true I shall uphold as truth.
What Our Party believe to be right I shall uphold as forever right.
And that our truth, and our righteous path, shall be an inviolable truth, and our path sacred.

I swear that, from this day forth,
No matter what enemies may assail us, or transgress against us,
That no “facts”; no “evidence”; no “opinions”; and no other truths,
Shall sway me from Our One Truth, Our One Faith, and Our One Glorious Destiny.

There shall be no criticism. There shall be no dissent.
Let us confound our enemies with silence. Let us crush those who oppose us with whispers.
Let us speak not of the poor. Let us speak not of the crippled or of the ill.
Let us cast not our eyes to the homeless who soil our streets, or the needy who will always need.

We are the One True People. We are the One True Party.
I hold Our Truths to be inalienable. I pledge to consecrate my life, my body, my soul to their service.
I pledge to uphold our Authority as absolute. We shall not be defied. We shall not be questioned.
It is Our Land to shape. Our Land to conquer. Our People to rule.

This is my solemn pledge to you on this day.

May God Help Us All..


*Snollygoster - Snollygoster is a 19th century American word for “a dishonest or corrupt politician”. Or, to take an original definition from the editor of a Georgia newspaper: “a snollygoster is a fellow who wants office, regardless of party, platform or principles, and who, whenever he wins, gets there by the sheer force of monumental talknophical assumnacy”. (via Mark Forsyth at The Guardian)

Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey found his debt crisis.

He made one up.

“Jolly Joe The Entertainer”, all he needs is a white lion, he could put on a magic show.

Newly elected Prime Minister Tony Abbott has been out hunting wabbits fighting fires

… to a playlist of “The Sounds of Silence” and “It’s Oh So Quiet”. On high rotation …

… and Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has been busily fortifying our fragile borders from the impure hordes which threaten the gene pool of this, the High Commonwealth of Australia. There he stands, binoculars at the ready, resplendent in uniform and medals and peak’d cap, scouring our shores for signs of any approaching mutant vermin so that they may be intercepted and banished to “Classification camps” before they can muddy the minds and precious bodily fluids of our proudly Caucasian race.

Business is taking care of business, and will soon take care of us.

Environment Minister Greg Hunt has been Learning Weather with Wikipedia.

We are assured, he assures us, as does his Dear Leader, that the current bushfires in New South Wales are nothing to do with climate change, it’s just a spot of shitty weather.

And besides, a few burning bushes now and then never did Moses any harm.

And the rich shall get richer, as is their want, and is their need, and everyone else can go fuck themselves …

“The Abbott government has indicated it will scale back or abolish entirely the agency charged with the administration of the national disability insurance scheme, instead handing the role to the soon-to-be privatised Medibank Private, The Australian Financial Review reports.”

And leave your money on the fridge …

Both the Liberals and Labor are guilty of resisting taxation models that attract revenue on a capacity to pay in order to provide services that protect and enfranchise all citizens. Where the Liberals shift the services debate is around imaginary “budget crises” that necessitate “savings”, causing services to be run down to the point that “fire protection” and other economically unequal mechanisms are shoved at the electorate if they wish to enjoy infrastructure at all.

Note that Barry O’Farrell‘s Liberal government cut $20m from the regional fire services now trying to battle the the New South Wales blaze. Note also that Joe Hockey is mentioned in the Australian today, appointing no less than the head of the Business Council of Australia to oversee an audit for federal government spending “savings”. The Australian says: “the terms of reference explicitly support the idea of “user-charging” and “co-payments” for government programs.”

… Hard times ahead. Times of sacrifice, difficult decisions, unpopular decisions. We cannot continue to maintain the illusion of reckless profligacy conjured by the former government, for we simply cannot afford it. Neither could they. That’s why, today, we find ourselves in the position we’re in, and nothing should be considered immune from review. We are faced with a precarious financial situation in a volatile global economic climate, and to pretend otherwise would risk serious damage to the growth and future prosperity of our country …


There are scores to be settled. Payback. History is being redefined by the victors, and the history will be written as a tumultuous narrative of dysfunction.

Rupert Murdoch’s McMuppets pay respectful homage …


And yet, some proles are grumbling. Some proles are surprised. Some proles are wondering where all the bad times went and they’re wondering if any of it was real, and if it were not, why were they told it was?

Stupid proles.

Under ordinary circumstances, it would of course be most unsurprising for this government to crack down on unions and workers’ rights, for the Liberal party’s historical raison d’être is its opposition to the labour movement. Hobbled by its pre-election stance, the party seems hollow, adrift from its roots and unsure of what it stands for – a criticism more commonly made of the ALP. Abbott will face pressure from within his own party as well as the commentariat to break his promise.”

Tony Abbott’s campaign speech, August 2011 …

“I make this pledge to you the Australian people.

I will govern for all Australians.

I want to lift everyone’s standard of living.

I want to see wages and benefits rise in line with a growing economy.

I want to see our hospitals and schools improving as we invest the proceeds of a well-run economy into the things that really count.

I won’t let you down.

This is my pledge to you.”

A pledge is not a promise. It’s just a pledge. A promise is different. That was a non-core pledge.

‘‘You know what Tony Abbott’s policy is: ‘If you don’t give me the job, I’ll wreck the place’,’’ [former Labor prime minister Paul Keating] told ABC TV.

The attack dog relishes only the attack, the blood that can be drawn, the flesh that can be ripped, the bones that can be snapped. Once dead, it loses all interest. There is no more life to be squeezed from it, and there the corpse lies, a carrion feast, a carcass, bones, dust, nothing.

Don Watson in The Monthly

“There are times when I feel I must say one thing and times when I must say another, very different, thing. This is the way of the world. It is not that I am indifferent to truth, but that truth is indifferent to me.

I will decide what I say and the circumstances in which I say it.”

The beast has slouched into Bethlehem, to find  itself hailed a master political strategist and statesman …

“[Liberal federal director] Brian [Loughnane]was able to manage his leader Tony Abbott to the needs of his party’s campaign strategy. He was able to stick to his plan of keeping his leader under tight control and of resisting pressure to release detailed policies and costings until after the voters had made up their mind.”

… having managed to win an election with no policies whatsoever, just a grab bag of catch cries, conspiracy theories and pure bullshit, and managing to walk on two legs without falling over.

Unchallenged, unquestioned, and all of it reported as “news”.

I live in a country full of halfwits.

Rupert Murdoch

You can’t have a free democracy if you don’t have a free media that can provide vital and independent information to the people.”

“I have always been a firm believer in providing the public with choice and access to quality content — it was the driving force behind the launch of Sky, Fox News and, particularly, The Australian.”

It is a strange world indeed when such statements can be made and expected to be received with straight faces.

It’s so strange it defies satire. Even Paddy Chayefsky couldn’t make this shit up.

In Tony Abbott’s “free democracy”, if you wanna know a secret, they’ll promise not to tell …

“The Abbott Coalition looks set to sign off on the highly secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership later this month, but what will it mean for ordinary Australians? Dr Matthew Mitchell reports.

WHAT SORT of “Trade Agreement” manages to both criminalise internet use and force coal seam fracking onto communities?

The answer to this is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a pact that has the ominous potential to achieve both these corporate objectives — and many more.”

Perhaps The Liberal Party could adopt “Always Follow The Money” as its next election slogan.

The Coalition has pledged to cut 12,000 public service positions through natural attrition …

… [Senator Eric Abetz] “We are asking our public service to look carefully at every position that becomes vacant and ask whether that position is really necessary; or whether there is a better way to do business.”

He said the change would maximise job opportunities for existing staff.”

Maximise job opportunities by slashing jobs, double or triple your existing staff’s workload with no additional remuneration for their troubles and watch them go fucking crazy.

Slash so-called “green tape” to “create a “better balance” between the environment and the economy” to “streamline processes” in the name of efficiency so that you may either build a floating casino on the Great Barrier Reef, or just pollute the fuck out of it for a here-and-now-gone-tomorrow quick buck.

We’ll hear a lot about “choice” as well, which is essentially no choice at all, and we’ll hear a lot about “flexibility” in the workforce which essentially means do what you’re fucking told when you’re told to do it for less money and no benefits, and we’ll hear a lot about “savings” which essentially means whatever it is you want we don’t that anymore, so piss off elsewhere. We’ll hear about “getting people back into jobs” which means humiliating that 60 year-old man who was made redundant after 30 years in his job by reducing his unemployment by fifty bucks a week or by forcing him into jobs so menial, he’ll want to blow his brains out after a week.

We’ll hear a lot of treacly motherhood statements about the importance of family and of children and of work and of “our values”, delivered with the type of clammy-handed, doe-eyed, drippy sincerity that is meant to signify that whatever it is they’re doing, it’s all for own good, and the good of the country, and people have to learn not to this and not to that and so on and so forth, and we’ll hear them at the same time we’re all being royally fucked over.

We’ll hear all about healthcare too, and maybe even “ageing burdens”, and about how millions of dollars are being spent here and millions are being spent somewhere else at the same time they’re kicking everybody’s crutches out from under them, the millions of dollars being little more than a series of squiggles on a piece of paper frenetically waved about at a press conference. And then there’s education, which is always good for a beating about the ears by governments who think the kids these days ain’t learnin’ what they oughts to be learnin’, which is important stuff like Aussie values and Aussie history and Aussie traditions, and none of this fucking fancy stuff like science and funny fuckin’ foreign people doing funny fuckin’ foreign things.

We’ll hear one thing one day, and something completely different the next. We’ll hear about some new crises and new emergencies and epidemics that aren’t, but the tabloids (with a little encouragement from our gumment) will insist that they are, and it’s the tabloids that get people squealin’ and all het up about stuff like that.

Specially funny fuckin’ foreign people doing funny fuckin’ foreign things.

And the weather. Don’t forget the weather.

With weather, you get socialism, doncha know.

I live in a country full of halfwits.

It has the government it deserves.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 143 other followers